for the diseases. The status of this preferred IT market contractor seems to be censored.
QUESTION: Realistically, to October 12, 2005, would “reasonable man” agree that the USDOL employees priority is to fund their administrative costs? Afterall, the employees have only agreed to compensate 15,972 of 600,000 or only about 2.6 percent of the “courageous American patriots.” Obviously, the Official’s pledged inheritance / entitlements have been stolen. It is long past overdue for the members of Congress to admit that their legislative intent and enforcement of their intent has failed.
Since year 1972, 1990, and 2000, a token inheritance was established under the ACTS. The ACTS were overwhelmingly approved by the US members of Congress. For instance, before and after October 30, 2000, the media reporters persistently advertised the EEOICPA details far and wide. The US President and the members of Congress proposed that the approval of the ACTs and amendments were meant to provide a ways and means to pay down the government “debt” owed to the “courageous American patriots,” they said. From that point in time, the reckless, negligent, abusive, and libelous department employees still believe they are authorized to inflict even more pain and suffering on the victims. When an EEOICP claim is denied or placed in the USDOL’s “PEND” file for an indefinite period of time, many claimants do not appeal because the “defendant’s” dictates are unintelligible.
QUESTION: It seems that the Officials and USDOL ESA director Turcic / cohorts are always attempting to prove that the USDOL process is much more effective than the USDOE’s failed process? That assertion is definitely not commendable. Thousands of “courageous American patriots” die from their toxic exposure wounds without receiving any assistance from their government according to the provisions of the ACTS. (EXHIBIT 5)
By year 2005, the EEOICP claimants are coerced, brainwashed, and intimidated until too many agree to terminate their own claim. Some agree to sign the department(s) “closure waiver(s)” that they believe will “get them a favorable decision.” The “waivers” are actually “gag orders” that are designed to be used as “loopholes” by the defendants. A claimant is instructed that they cannot receive the final copy of the department’s dose reconstruction unless they agree to sign their “closure waiver.” The USHHS – CDC NIOSH employees retain the right to make any changes to their dose reconstruction papers after the claimant receives / reviews the draft content. If the claimant doesn’t agree to sign the “closure waiver,” the department employees threaten to recommend to the USDOL that the claim shall be dismissed. Especially, the USHHS OCAS director Larry Elliott and his boss Dr. John Howard use this harassing ploy to intimidate the vulnerable sick victims or their survivors. In conjunction with USDOL Shelby Hallmark
