•
See EEOICPA Provisions at:
See EEOICPA Provisions at: URL internet location http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ocas/pdfs/theact/title36.pdf
URL internet location http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2000_register&docid=00-31692-filed
“Courageous Americans” were the definitive words used by President Clinton to characterize the isolated nuclear workers. By mid-April 2000, the President and his staff apologized to the workers for making them sick. He and his staff admitted liability for their nuclear facility “caretakers” negligence and abuse that caused death, disease, and suffering of untold numbers of victims and their families. For a time, the Officials declared that the “burden of proof” was the government’s responsibility. However, the Officials’ negligent and abusive department employees are sanctioned to invoke their contrary “interim regulations” that are intended to shift the “burden of proof” to the “courageous American patriots” — an oppressive and/or abusive reality.
Ironically, the way the government Officials thank the “courageous American patriots” for identifying their nuclear facility “caretakers” unsafe policies, principles and practices is by allowing our careers, our health, our financial stability, and assets to be destroyed. The focus of the Officials and their department cohorts was/is to censor the evidence of wrongdoing by convincing the media that the “issues” have been or are being dealt with by the government.
After five years since the EEOICPA was enacted on October 30, 2000, the Officials are finally getting around to investigating the breach of the government employee(s) fiduciary duties; their malpractice; their negligence; their fraudulent acts; their abuse of discretion, etc. for what appears to be political reasons. EXHIBIT 1 — the June 9, 2005, letter from the US House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary to US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales identifies the department employees as “defendants” because “transparency” is of concern. The letter also affirms: (1) the mismanagement of the intent of Congress; and (2) the waiver of all claimants due process rights in accordance with the Constitution. Due process, in the context of the United States, refers to how and why laws are enforced. It applies to all persons, citizen, or alien as well as to corporation. See EXHIBIT 2 — the November 19, 2004, subject letter from the US House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary to USHHS Secretary Tommy Thompson. The letter(s) explain that the Congress has jurisdiction over claims against the government and the EEOICPA.
See EXHIBIT 3-ITEM 1 OF 4 — the May 5, 2005, letter from US House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary to the Government Accountability Office (GAO). The letter recommends the probe of possible abuses relative to the asbestos scandals in regard to the Black Lung Act, EEOICPA, and RECA provisions. The GAO
